Really no ideas / recommendations how to handle this in TM1?
Below link is about how other tools handly those business needs. Furthermore it describes my issues more detailed and it gives a good overview about the subject in general.
http://www.sqlbi.com/articles/many2many/
Search found 6 matches
- Tue Aug 13, 2013 8:48 am
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: many to many relationship
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5442
- Thu Aug 08, 2013 1:04 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: many to many relationship
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5442
Re: many to many relationship
Hi, I try to give you some additional information. I attached a sample model, some sample data and desirable results. Hopefully it illustrate my issue a bit more. As long as a measure (e.g. downtime) rely on one incident_id and one incident_id can affect more services i have a summarisability proble...
- Wed Aug 07, 2013 2:43 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: many to many relationship
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5442
many to many relationship
Hi, is it possible to imagine a many to many relationship in TM1? For example, i have a incident fact table and a time and status dimension table. The relationship between incidents, time and status allows storing the state of every incident and for every month. And an incident can have several stat...
- Tue Jul 30, 2013 1:53 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: consolidatedavg not at all dimensions?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6894
Re: consolidatedavg not at all dimensions?
Thanks Lance! The hint with the if Statement solved the issue for me. I did it that way: ['Measure A'] = C: IF( DTYPE('DimA',!DimA) @= 'N' ,ConsolidatedAVg(...) ,STET ); Additionaly i had to change the dimension order in the cube, to get the right sum in the C nodes of both dimension ... Helpful for...
- Mon Jul 29, 2013 4:55 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: consolidatedavg not at all dimensions?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6894
Re: consolidatedavg not at all dimensions?
Thx for a reply! I changed the rule to ['Measure A'] = C:ConsolidatedAvg(0, '', !DimYear, 'cons_elem', 'Measure A'); But it changed nothing at the result. I tried also to work with the STET function. But didn't get it. YEs, i tried it with value 1. But that didn't work neither. Probably it was not c...
- Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:52 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: consolidatedavg not at all dimensions?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6894
consolidatedavg not at all dimensions?
Hello, i have a problem with the consolidatedavg function and hopefully anyone could help me to deal with it. I have a sample cube with three dimensions. I attached a picture to demonstrate my problem. 1. Measure A should be consolidated as average along the time dimension, but shoul be consolidated...