Spread % Change add
Posted: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:50 pm
I think this is a bug. But after searching around a bit, I don't see anybody else complaining about it, so maybe it is by design. But why anybody would want it that way ...
My user wanted to increase a future budget by 2% over a range of accounts, cost centres and periods.
I had them do a spread, using 2% Add.
But what TM1 actually did surprised the heck out of me.
Negative numbers moved toward zero, instead of away.
e.g. 1000 and -1000 after a 2% Add became 1020 and -980
I expected it to be 1020 and -1020
(The correct incantation is to do a 102% Replacement.)
Undoing this change was quite trickey, because no single transformation would put the numbers back the way they were. I had to write a TI process to operate on just the negative numbers.
So, I got the problem fixed, but the next person who wants to do a spread to increase positive and negative numbers could easily make the same mistake.
(9.5.2)
My user wanted to increase a future budget by 2% over a range of accounts, cost centres and periods.
I had them do a spread, using 2% Add.
But what TM1 actually did surprised the heck out of me.
Negative numbers moved toward zero, instead of away.
e.g. 1000 and -1000 after a 2% Add became 1020 and -980
I expected it to be 1020 and -1020
(The correct incantation is to do a 102% Replacement.)
Undoing this change was quite trickey, because no single transformation would put the numbers back the way they were. I had to write a TI process to operate on just the negative numbers.
So, I got the problem fixed, but the next person who wants to do a spread to increase positive and negative numbers could easily make the same mistake.
(9.5.2)