Consolidated Elements don't Consolidate
Posted: Wed May 08, 2013 6:32 am
Dear Sirs, hi everybody...
Regarding to Consolidated Elements and Feeders Statements, I have only one issue... let me explain...
************ FIRST SCENARIO ************
This is my Rule (all elements are leaf levels): ['LeafLevel1', 'LeafLevel2', 'LeafLevel3'] = N:DB('CubeName', !DimensionA, !DimensionB, 'Element_N');
This is my Feeder (in another cube): ['Element_N'] => ['LeafLevel1', 'LeafLevel2', 'LeafLevel3'];
...the consolidated level ("Total") of "LeafLevel3", brings to me the correct amount without problem
************ SECOND SCENARIO ************
This is Another Rule (only a single element is Consolidated): ['LeafLevel1', 'ConsolidatedLevel', 'LeafLevel3'] = C:DB('CubeName', !DimensionA, !DimensionB, 'Element_N');
This is my Feeder (in another cube): "it don't need feeder statements"
...but, in this second scenario, the consolidated level ("Total") of "LeafLevel3", doesn't works, because this concolidated level shows: "0"
You can see the attachment Excel file for a better understanding..., then, my question is:
How can I fix this situation?, in the Second Scenario, without alter the rule, because when I change "C:" by "N:", then the rule doesn't work neither.
Regards,
Regarding to Consolidated Elements and Feeders Statements, I have only one issue... let me explain...
************ FIRST SCENARIO ************
This is my Rule (all elements are leaf levels): ['LeafLevel1', 'LeafLevel2', 'LeafLevel3'] = N:DB('CubeName', !DimensionA, !DimensionB, 'Element_N');
This is my Feeder (in another cube): ['Element_N'] => ['LeafLevel1', 'LeafLevel2', 'LeafLevel3'];
...the consolidated level ("Total") of "LeafLevel3", brings to me the correct amount without problem
************ SECOND SCENARIO ************
This is Another Rule (only a single element is Consolidated): ['LeafLevel1', 'ConsolidatedLevel', 'LeafLevel3'] = C:DB('CubeName', !DimensionA, !DimensionB, 'Element_N');
This is my Feeder (in another cube): "it don't need feeder statements"
...but, in this second scenario, the consolidated level ("Total") of "LeafLevel3", doesn't works, because this concolidated level shows: "0"
You can see the attachment Excel file for a better understanding..., then, my question is:
How can I fix this situation?, in the Second Scenario, without alter the rule, because when I change "C:" by "N:", then the rule doesn't work neither.
Regards,