Lotsaram,
Thank you for running the same tests and validating my findings...
To answer a couple of your questions/statements...
No, the workbook was not protected
Yes, I was aware of the hidden worksheet as well as the range name
After coming across this protection issue, I came up with another workaround that would have worked brilliantly except for the fact the range in the Picklist sheet gets overwritten in Column A and I need two different picklists
There are a couple of Picklists I need to create within the same workbook so I figured I could have a couple of cells on a hidden Control sheet that would reference the Picklists
This would then create the range within the Picklist sheet
I then could create a range name using the offset function which would creat a dynamic range and finally I would use Data Validation for my dropdowns which WORK when the worksheet is protected
Alas, the range on the Picklist sheet gets overwritten when you go from one picklist to the other so it just becomes a jumbled mess of elements
Gotta love that IBM Cognos programming
So in the end I have had to accept the fact that I cannot have a fully dynamic element list
However, I do have a semi-dynamic one where I have a hidden control sheet, utilizing the subsiz function and submn functions as well as a dynamic subset and the Excel offset function I mentioned earlier
I then created a Range Name using the offset function and a Data Validation drop down box
The only draw back is that I have copied 100 rows of subnm functions in my control sheet assuming the user community will not outgrow the template any time soon
When the users outgrow it, I will just go into the template and copy some additional rows down since the offset function will capture the range dynamically
I've used this same techique in the past when I was an OutlookSoft developer working with EVDRE spreadsheets
EVDRE to OutlookSoft/SAP BPC is Active Forms in TM1 except they are actually more powerful
Given that I've been developing TM1 models for 17 years and still love it there aren't too many areas where OutlookSoft/SAP BPC will win but in this case it does
As for logging this to IBM I am completely surprised and a bit disappointed that it's been over a year since 9.5 came out and no one else has come across this issue
Unfortunately what that says to me, which I already know is that IBM Cognos is putting absolutely no effort into Perspectives and do not respect the spreadsheet
How very very sad...
On that note, not every organization needs to build dimensions utilizing TI... I personally love to work with TI
But when you have dimensions that are static, the xdi works just fine
Have you created a new dimension using an XDI in 9.5 or 9.5.1?
Fortunately I've built so many dimensions that I know there is a missing column now and that I have to add it
For the newbies out there, how would they know?
How about rules?
While the enhanced rules editor is nice, I still like the XRU
I can have multiple rules files for development purposes within the same workbook
So when the "fake" error appears when I compile the rule I know to ignore it but again it's just a lack of interest on IBM Cognos to fix anything that is broken within the spreadsheet
And last but not least, the Processing Spreadsheet...
While I certainly do all of my ETL with TI, the processing spreadsheet was brilliant for zeroing out a cube
Now I have to create a bunch of throw away views to do it in TI since they broke the processing spreadsheet functionality back in 9.4
For all the new TM1 folks out there, the spreadsheet is still very powerful
The trend is to create all the logic within rules... I don't believe that is necessarily the best approach
I have actually done some development with IBM Cognos EP and certainly the Picklist is a nice feature (one of the few in my opinion)
But you certainly were never using it in a spreadsheet, thus the lack of effort developing it properly within perspectives
And one final note, the Application Folder is so powerful and I don't think most people really understand this
The fact that TM1 Contributor came out with no Application Folder capabilities just boggles the mind
Does IBM Cognos really think that work flow is more important than controlling the planning process?
Again, clueless...
Thanks again for validating my results... it is much appreciated
Solanna