Suggestions for detailed security?
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 6:49 pm
Hi all,
If you have the need to do account level security across many departments and cost center combination's, what is the best way? This client of mine has over 1000 GL accounts, 150 Depts, and over 100 cost centers. They only want certain accounts to be visible for each Dept/Center combination. I know I could do this manually by setting up many groups designated as Dept/Center and then flag the accounts that need to be visible and either read/write, but it seems like there would be a more efficient way.
1) Is there a way to import excel or text files that have the security parameters? I used to do this via access tables for them in their old CP application they outgrew.
Also, can someone give me the 10,000 ft level explanation and rationale for control cubes? I've read a good bit in the developers and operational guides, but I still think I'm missing something. Would it benefit me to do my security in a control cube rather than using the "system" or "data" cube (hope I phrased that correctly).
Thanks,
Christian
If you have the need to do account level security across many departments and cost center combination's, what is the best way? This client of mine has over 1000 GL accounts, 150 Depts, and over 100 cost centers. They only want certain accounts to be visible for each Dept/Center combination. I know I could do this manually by setting up many groups designated as Dept/Center and then flag the accounts that need to be visible and either read/write, but it seems like there would be a more efficient way.
1) Is there a way to import excel or text files that have the security parameters? I used to do this via access tables for them in their old CP application they outgrew.
Also, can someone give me the 10,000 ft level explanation and rationale for control cubes? I've read a good bit in the developers and operational guides, but I still think I'm missing something. Would it benefit me to do my security in a control cube rather than using the "system" or "data" cube (hope I phrased that correctly).
Thanks,
Christian