Advanced Feeders
Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 1:27 pm
Hello,
Sadly The wiki-article (http://wiki.olapforums.com/index.php?title=TM1_Feeders) lacks advanced information.
When I started three years ago, I was told, that I can feeed N=>C, must not feed C=>*
I read in forums, that C=>C is possible, but not a very perfromant idea.
In my model the only possibility was (an intercube) feeder C=>C on multiple dimensions of the cube.
The virtually Virtual Cube (there are some values in some scenarios, but most is calculated) is feedered by Cube A, like this:
['N1', 'C1', 'C2'] => DB('N1','N2','C1','C2','N2','C3');
which does not work. If the feeder is split to
['N1', 'C1N1', 'C2'] => DB('N1','N2','C1N1','C2','N2','C3');
['N1', 'C1N2', 'C2'] => DB('N1','N2','C1N2','C2','N2','C3');
it will work, altough tehre is still a C element involved on right and left side...
This is confusing, isn't it?
My Questions are:
c=>n ... works
n=>c ... works
c=>n better or equal n=>c ?
c=>c ... works
c=>c ... avoid when possible (whenever the consolidations children won't change - like cummulated months)
Did you have simmilar problems, where seemingly equivalent feeders work - or don't?
I know, that this isn't a very good formulated question - please forgive me this time - I'm desperate, again.
kr,
Lukas
Sadly The wiki-article (http://wiki.olapforums.com/index.php?title=TM1_Feeders) lacks advanced information.
When I started three years ago, I was told, that I can feeed N=>C, must not feed C=>*
I read in forums, that C=>C is possible, but not a very perfromant idea.
In my model the only possibility was (an intercube) feeder C=>C on multiple dimensions of the cube.
The virtually Virtual Cube (there are some values in some scenarios, but most is calculated) is feedered by Cube A, like this:
['N1', 'C1', 'C2'] => DB('N1','N2','C1','C2','N2','C3');
which does not work. If the feeder is split to
['N1', 'C1N1', 'C2'] => DB('N1','N2','C1N1','C2','N2','C3');
['N1', 'C1N2', 'C2'] => DB('N1','N2','C1N2','C2','N2','C3');
it will work, altough tehre is still a C element involved on right and left side...
This is confusing, isn't it?
My Questions are:
c=>n ... works
n=>c ... works
c=>n better or equal n=>c ?
c=>c ... works
c=>c ... avoid when possible (whenever the consolidations children won't change - like cummulated months)
Did you have simmilar problems, where seemingly equivalent feeders work - or don't?
I know, that this isn't a very good formulated question - please forgive me this time - I'm desperate, again.
kr,
Lukas