TM1 9.4 FP2 - Web Garden Process issue

Post Reply
Ernest
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 1:19 pm
OLAP Product: TM1
Version: 9.4
Excel Version: 2003

TM1 9.4 FP2 - Web Garden Process issue

Post by Ernest »

Environment:
We're a new install of TM1, using 64 Bit TM1 9.4 FP2 on one 8 CPU server with a second 4 CPU 32 Bit Windows 2003 SP2 server functioning as the Web Server.

Question/Issue:
On the Web server, in IIS 6.0, we've set an application pool for the TM1Web web site, and whenever we try and set the "maximum number of processes" to greater than 1 to achieve "potential" performance gains from having an IIS web garden, the users can't log in or have to log in multiple times in rapid succession or and have to re-login frequently....its unusable with more than one process.

Can more than one worker process ever be used?


IBM support has not provided guidance on this yet and I'm wondering if they know about the web garden feature or not for TM1.

The reason for us pushing on this is that our infrastructure folks want to maximize performance, and seeing a single w3wp.exe process on the 4 CPU web server makes them unhappy. We've seen the w3wp.exe process generally running at 500-600 MB on a 4GB box.

Also, we did a small stress test recently, and did not see the memory leakage that another post experienced:
http://forums.olapforums.com/viewtopic. ... .exe#p5639

Environment:

Microsoft Server 2003 Standard x64 Edition SP2 for TM1 9.4 FP2

Microsoft Server 2003 Standard Edition SP2 for TM1Web


Info from MS for those interested:

In IIS 6.0 worker process isolation mode, application pools enhance Web site or application reliability by isolating applications and the worker processes that service those applications. For even greater reliability, you can configure an application pool to be supported by multiple worker processes. An application pool that uses more than one worker process is called a Web garden. The worker processes in a Web garden share the requests that arrive for that particular application pool. If a worker process fails, another worker process can continue to process requests.
User avatar
mattgoff
MVP
Posts: 516
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 1:37 pm
OLAP Product: TM1
Version: 10.2.2.6
Excel Version: O365
Location: Florida, USA

Re: TM1 9.4 FP2 - Web Garden Process issue

Post by mattgoff »

Easy answer on this one, but not the one you want to hear: Web Gardens are not supported. I looked into this a while back (9.0.2) and got an official "no" from support. I haven't seen anything in the docs to show that it's changed.

Matt
Please read and follow the Request for Assistance Guidelines. It helps us answer your question and saves everyone a lot of time.
Ernest
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 1:19 pm
OLAP Product: TM1
Version: 9.4
Excel Version: 2003

Re: TM1 9.4 FP2 - Web Garden Process issue

Post by Ernest »

Thanks.

I still have an SR with IBM on it. If they do come back with anything I'll post it.
Martin Erlmoser
Community Contributor
Posts: 125
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 1:22 pm
OLAP Product: TM1, Cognos Express,..
Version: 9.1.4 FP1
Excel Version: 2010
Location: Vienna
Contact:

Re: TM1 9.4 FP2 - Web Garden Process issue

Post by Martin Erlmoser »

also heard "not supported"
Ernest
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 1:19 pm
OLAP Product: TM1
Version: 9.4
Excel Version: 2003

Re: TM1 9.4 FP2 - Web Garden Process issue

Post by Ernest »

Per IBM Support, more than 1 worker process for a web garden application pool is still not available.

We'll be submitting an enhancement request, though I'm not sure if it will add much performance to TM1Web, as it sounds like its more for reliability.
lotsaram
MVP
Posts: 3698
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 11:14 am
OLAP Product: TableManager1
Version: PA 2.0.x
Excel Version: Office 365
Location: Switzerland

Re: TM1 9.4 FP2 - Web Garden Process issue

Post by lotsaram »

It is possible to get better utilisation from your hardware but only if you go to the trouble of setting up separate websites and app pools (and then load share by whatever suitable method.)

Not that simple and not what you want to hear but possible...
Post Reply