Consolidation to create forecast
Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2017 3:00 pm
Hi all,
version 10.1
Apologies in advance if there is not enough information, obviously more can be provided, I guess at this stage I am hoping for the 'in theory' answer.
I have a model which, among other things, calculates a staffing forecast and allows users to make adjustments to the calculated forecast. Currently the user adjustment adds a value to the calculated forecast. So for example if the total of the calculated forecast is 100 and the user enters an adjustment of 10 the new forecast is 110. However the client would like to move away from this method and instead have the user adjustment replace the forecast rather than adding to it. So for example if the total of the calculated forecast is 100 and the user enters an adjustment of 10 the new forecast is 10.
I am trying to think of the best way to achieve this and cannot think much beyond adding in some N level rules, I pretty much have this approach figured out. But I was hoping I could change the consolidations instead, however thus far without much success!
So I am looking for some help!
I have attached a file which provides a bit more information.
cheers, Mark
version 10.1
Apologies in advance if there is not enough information, obviously more can be provided, I guess at this stage I am hoping for the 'in theory' answer.
I have a model which, among other things, calculates a staffing forecast and allows users to make adjustments to the calculated forecast. Currently the user adjustment adds a value to the calculated forecast. So for example if the total of the calculated forecast is 100 and the user enters an adjustment of 10 the new forecast is 110. However the client would like to move away from this method and instead have the user adjustment replace the forecast rather than adding to it. So for example if the total of the calculated forecast is 100 and the user enters an adjustment of 10 the new forecast is 10.
I am trying to think of the best way to achieve this and cannot think much beyond adding in some N level rules, I pretty much have this approach figured out. But I was hoping I could change the consolidations instead, however thus far without much success!
So I am looking for some help!
I have attached a file which provides a bit more information.
cheers, Mark