Strange Error, No Info
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 5:49 pm
Greetings,
I'm receiving an error that I've never seen before. Here are the two lines from the tm1server.log that are of particular interest.
TM1.Cube.Iterator CubeCellIterator::initalizeTreePosReferences: Index '1' of dimension '}Cubes' could not be found. Ending iteration.
TM1.Cube.Iterator CubeCellIterator::initializeReferences: Failure to reacquire write tree positions from the target cube '}DimensionAudit'. Ending iteration.
}DimensionAudit is a cube that we use for tracking which dimensions are attached to which cubes. This cube is then used as a source for a data copy operation we're doing (We have a version dimension, and they want to be able to snapshot cubes that use that dimension so they can look later).
I've tried restarting the server, but no luck. This process was previously working fine, so I'm not certain what has gone wrong. The process has also stopped working in our TEST environment, with a similar error. Google-Fu got me nowhere. There is a stack overflow issue, but I don't *think* it's related. Or, rather, I can't think of why it would be related.
We're on TM1 10.2.2 FP5 IF1.
I'm receiving an error that I've never seen before. Here are the two lines from the tm1server.log that are of particular interest.
TM1.Cube.Iterator CubeCellIterator::initalizeTreePosReferences: Index '1' of dimension '}Cubes' could not be found. Ending iteration.
TM1.Cube.Iterator CubeCellIterator::initializeReferences: Failure to reacquire write tree positions from the target cube '}DimensionAudit'. Ending iteration.
}DimensionAudit is a cube that we use for tracking which dimensions are attached to which cubes. This cube is then used as a source for a data copy operation we're doing (We have a version dimension, and they want to be able to snapshot cubes that use that dimension so they can look later).
I've tried restarting the server, but no luck. This process was previously working fine, so I'm not certain what has gone wrong. The process has also stopped working in our TEST environment, with a similar error. Google-Fu got me nowhere. There is a stack overflow issue, but I don't *think* it's related. Or, rather, I can't think of why it would be related.
We're on TM1 10.2.2 FP5 IF1.