Feeders in Drill through Rules
Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2015 4:46 am
Is it required to write feeders for drill through rule ? My assumption it is not required please advise .
I am on 10.2.2 FP2
I am on 10.2.2 FP2
Discussing all things TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
https://www.tm1forum.com/
What, excatly, do you mean by a "drill through rule"? It is my understanding that a feeder needs to be considered when you have SKIPCHECK declared. If the Rule is at N level and it is not returning a 0 then a Feeder rule is required.Is it required to write feeders for drill through rule ? My assumption it is not required please advise .
While I am here, do you use the advanced rules editor in 10.2.2 FP2? As it's maintainence and possibly its existence as a whole is moribund.I am on 10.2.2 FP2
I presume the OP is referring to Drill Assignment rules; which are assigned to a cube in order to specify which cells can initiate which drill process/processes. It would be entirely string (no N cells).TrevorGoss wrote:Hello,
What, excatly, do you mean by a "drill through rule"? It is my understanding that a feeder needs to be considered when you have SKIPCHECK declared. If the Rule is at N level and it is not returning a 0 then a Feeder rule is required.
Hello Declan, thanks for this information, never used these before.I presume the OP is referring to Drill Assignment rules; which are assigned to a cube in order to specify which cells can initiate which drill process/processes. It would be entirely string (no N cells).
The concept of a drill process is that you would want to be able to drill from any cell; even if that cell has a zero in it - it's possible that the user would want to drill to the source system or cube to see that zero or what makes up that zero.
As such I have never put skipcheck or feeders on a drill assignment rule and (other users may disagree) have never noticed any performance issues etc.