feeder fire sequence
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2014 4:53 pm
I have a dimension in Cube1, which has below elements { A1, A2, A3, B, C, D, E, F, ...}.
To A1,A2,A3, they will result calculation 1 in cube2; and rest elements in the dimension of cube1 will cause calculation 2(different to calculation 1) in cube2.
Now, in the feeder, which statement should I put first to have both take effect?
[{'A1','A2','A3'}] => DB(Cube2, ...)
[ ] => DB(Cube2, ...) <--- here I use [] instead of ['B','C','D','E','F',...], since such elements are long to list one by one.
In addition, I remember in rule, the first statement will take effect, so that below statements will both work. is it correct?
[{'A1','A2','A3'}] =N: Calculation1;
[ ]=N: calculation 2;
Regards,
Chris
To A1,A2,A3, they will result calculation 1 in cube2; and rest elements in the dimension of cube1 will cause calculation 2(different to calculation 1) in cube2.
Now, in the feeder, which statement should I put first to have both take effect?
[{'A1','A2','A3'}] => DB(Cube2, ...)
[ ] => DB(Cube2, ...) <--- here I use [] instead of ['B','C','D','E','F',...], since such elements are long to list one by one.
In addition, I remember in rule, the first statement will take effect, so that below statements will both work. is it correct?
[{'A1','A2','A3'}] =N: Calculation1;
[ ]=N: calculation 2;
Regards,
Chris