Memory usage in 10.1.1 FP2
Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 11:28 pm
Hello guys,
We have been doing a test with the performance of 9.5.2 and 10.1. And I can´t explain the following situation:
Our normal behaviour is:
9.5.2 FP2
MaximumCubeLoadThreads = 10
(ParallelInteraction parameter not included in tm1s.cfg)
Memory Used 7.4 GB
Garbage Memory = 4.0 GB
316 seg to start
On the performance testing:
10.1.1 FP2
MaximumCubeLoadThreads = 10
(ParallelInteraction is default, but not included in tm1s.cfg)
Memory 3.3 GB as taskmgr.exe
(Sorry we could not run performance monitor)
46 seg to start
We changed the MaxumumcubeLoadThreads parameter with similar results on less than 10 cores.
A lot of the memory is related to feeders.
4.0 GB are not retained in memory on the tm1sd.exe process. and is a lot of memory that is free, I understand we paid those 4 GB for a quick startup with 10 cores and they never get free, as TM1 works like that. 3.3 GB seems to be used in both servers for our objects, as the memory of the cubes is very similar.
But is this a parallel interaction effect or some new magic on version 10? We are not using any persistentfeeders.
Any comment will help a lot to understand, or something I am not looking at.
Rod
We have been doing a test with the performance of 9.5.2 and 10.1. And I can´t explain the following situation:
Our normal behaviour is:
9.5.2 FP2
MaximumCubeLoadThreads = 10
(ParallelInteraction parameter not included in tm1s.cfg)
Memory Used 7.4 GB
Garbage Memory = 4.0 GB
316 seg to start
On the performance testing:
10.1.1 FP2
MaximumCubeLoadThreads = 10
(ParallelInteraction is default, but not included in tm1s.cfg)
Memory 3.3 GB as taskmgr.exe
(Sorry we could not run performance monitor)
46 seg to start
We changed the MaxumumcubeLoadThreads parameter with similar results on less than 10 cores.
A lot of the memory is related to feeders.
4.0 GB are not retained in memory on the tm1sd.exe process. and is a lot of memory that is free, I understand we paid those 4 GB for a quick startup with 10 cores and they never get free, as TM1 works like that. 3.3 GB seems to be used in both servers for our objects, as the memory of the cubes is very similar.
But is this a parallel interaction effect or some new magic on version 10? We are not using any persistentfeeders.
Any comment will help a lot to understand, or something I am not looking at.
Rod