Hi All,
Is there any document available which talks about band width considerations for TM1 10.2.2 - where end users are to access the application across geography - connected via LAN/WAN ?
Following is the document already available.
http://download.boulder.ibm.com/ibmdl/p ... ations.pdf
However - its pretty old - and as the document itself suggests - recommendations are suitable in TM1 8.2 through TM1 9.1. Do we have similar kind of document for Version 10 and above?
Thanks and Regards.
Laha.
Bandwidth Consideration
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2014 2:15 am
- OLAP Product: TM1
- Version: 9.5.2
- Excel Version: 2007
- jim wood
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3958
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 1:51 pm
- OLAP Product: TM1
- Version: PA 2.0.7
- Excel Version: Office 365
- Location: 37 East 18th Street New York
- Contact:
Re: Bandwidth Consideration
That'll pretty much cover architect and we up to 10.2. You'd need to ask IBM for statistics for PM, The new web and more importantly Cafe. After all Cafe was added for WAN issues. I'm sure they're full of useful stats showing how much Cafe is faster,
Jim.
Jim.
Struggling through the quagmire of life to reach the other side of who knows where.
Shop at Amazon
Jimbo PC Builds on YouTube
OS: Mac OS 11 PA Version: 2.0.7
Shop at Amazon
Jimbo PC Builds on YouTube
OS: Mac OS 11 PA Version: 2.0.7
- mattgoff
- MVP
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 1:37 pm
- OLAP Product: TM1
- Version: 10.2.2.6
- Excel Version: O365
- Location: Florida, USA
Re: Bandwidth Consideration
Assuming you're interested in performance and not usage, here's the one liner: for native access, users should be on the same LAN. Most WAN access is going to be unacceptably slow. I'm located in Florida and have about 90 ms pings to the server in San Francisco. It's completely unusable natively for me. I (and all other US but non-SF users) access TM1 via Remote Desktop.
I had a hardware issue during my last upgrade and had to temporarily put my San Francisco server on a box in Phoenix, about 750 miles away. SF is our HQ and PHX is our primary data center, so we have a massive, direct pipe connecting them. Latencies were in the 19ms range. Although the system was usable until I got the normal server sorted out, I got daily gripes from the San Francisco users about performance. I'd call it at the upper range for usability, YMMV.
Matt
I had a hardware issue during my last upgrade and had to temporarily put my San Francisco server on a box in Phoenix, about 750 miles away. SF is our HQ and PHX is our primary data center, so we have a massive, direct pipe connecting them. Latencies were in the 19ms range. Although the system was usable until I got the normal server sorted out, I got daily gripes from the San Francisco users about performance. I'd call it at the upper range for usability, YMMV.
Matt
Please read and follow the Request for Assistance Guidelines. It helps us answer your question and saves everyone a lot of time.
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2014 2:15 am
- OLAP Product: TM1
- Version: 9.5.2
- Excel Version: 2007
Re: Bandwidth Consideration
Thanks a lot Jim and Matt for your reply. It was useful to me.