Hi All,
3872 [98] INFO 2014-06-16 14:00:40.569 TM1.Process Process "Process_Name": finished executing normally, elapsed time 1818.91 seconds
Above line is from TM1 server log file.
3872 - Thread ID
[98] - ??
INFO - Message Level
2014-06-16 14:00:40.569 - Date and time
TM1.Process - TM Logger Name
Process "Process_Name": finished executing normally, elapsed time 1818.91 seconds - Message Text
Can someone please let me know what the 98 represents for, having in red color font.
Regards,
Deepak Jain
TM1 Server log
-
- Regular Participant
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 10:32 am
- OLAP Product: TM1
- Version: 9.5.2; 10.2.2
- Excel Version: 2007
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6647
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 2:30 am
- OLAP Product: TM1
- Version: PA2.0.9.18 Classic NO PAW!
- Excel Version: 2013 and Office 365
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact:
Re: TM1 Server log
I wouldn't worry about it; it doesn't seem to be relevant. It appears to be a hexadecimal ID code representing a client session ID for the current server session, with each new session being incremented by 2. It only appears to be populated for manually triggered processes or chores for that session.deepakjain2020 wrote:Hi All,
3872 [98] INFO 2014-06-16 14:00:40.569 TM1.Process Process "Process_Name": finished executing normally, elapsed time 1818.91 seconds
Above line is from TM1 server log file.
3872 - Thread ID
[98] - ??
INFO - Message Level
2014-06-16 14:00:40.569 - Date and time
TM1.Process - TM Logger Name
Process "Process_Name": finished executing normally, elapsed time 1818.91 seconds - Message Text
Can someone please let me know what the 98 represents for, having in red color font.
In the log file for my test environment, all of the scheduled chores have nothing between the brackets. I then triggered a chore manually and it appeared as [2]. Then I logged out and logged back in and did another one, and it showed as [4]. Then I logged out and ran another one from a different client ID and it appeared as [6]. Then I opened a session of Architect and ran another one, and it appeared as [8]. Any other chores or single processes that I ran during the same sessions got the same ID code. In the next session [8] was replaced by [a], then next time [a] was replaced by [c], then in the one after that [c] was replaced by [e], then the next one [e] was replaced by [10].
So [98] would represent 4C hex (that is, 98 hex \ 2 ) sessions which represents the 76th client session for that server session based on the tests shown above. Not particularly useful information. The only relevance would be if you wanted to know which processes or chores had been triggered in the one client session.
"To them, equipment failure is terrifying. To me, it’s 'Tuesday.' "
-----------
Before posting, please check the documentation, the FAQ, the Search function and FOR THE LOVE OF GLUB the Request Guidelines.
-----------
Before posting, please check the documentation, the FAQ, the Search function and FOR THE LOVE OF GLUB the Request Guidelines.
-
- Regular Participant
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2012 1:03 pm
- OLAP Product: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, P
- Version: PAW 2.0.8
- Excel Version: 2019
Re: TM1 Server log
Amazing Alan,You never cease to suprise us with depth of your knowlege.Thanks a ton.
"You Never Fail Until You Stop Trying......"
-
- Regular Participant
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 10:32 am
- OLAP Product: TM1
- Version: 9.5.2; 10.2.2
- Excel Version: 2007
Re: TM1 Server log
When I triggered again 98 was replaced by 2.
Thanks Alan for information
Thanks Alan for information

-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6647
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 2:30 am
- OLAP Product: TM1
- Version: PA2.0.9.18 Classic NO PAW!
- Excel Version: 2013 and Office 365
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact:
Re: TM1 Server log
Thank you, but in fairness that wasn't knowledge, that was just "fluffing around with a test session and seeing what happened".BariAbdul wrote:Amazing Alan,You never cease to suprise us with depth of your knowlege.Thanks a ton.

Most likely you had rebooted the server since the previous run; a data save alone doesn't seem to reset the ID number. (Some of the chores / processes that I ran in my tests did Save Data All.)deepakjain2020 wrote:When I triggered again 98 was replaced by 2.
"To them, equipment failure is terrifying. To me, it’s 'Tuesday.' "
-----------
Before posting, please check the documentation, the FAQ, the Search function and FOR THE LOVE OF GLUB the Request Guidelines.
-----------
Before posting, please check the documentation, the FAQ, the Search function and FOR THE LOVE OF GLUB the Request Guidelines.