}StatsByCube

Post Reply
EvgenyT
Community Contributor
Posts: 324
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 9:39 pm
OLAP Product: TM1
Version: PAL 2.0.8
Excel Version: 2016
Location: Sydney, Australia

}StatsByCube

Post by EvgenyT »

Hi Guys,

Looking at example below. Would you make the same assumption as me that "ONE" calculated cell in this cube is underfed? :)

I have a cube performing certain calculations and feeders for those calculations in 3 different cubes. All my data is correct and I have no problem reconciling it at the consolidated level .
example.png
example.png (15.02 KiB) Viewed 2675 times
Duncan P
MVP
Posts: 600
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 1:19 pm
OLAP Product: TM1
Version: 9.5.2 10.1 10.2
Excel Version: 2003 2007
Location: York, UK

Re: }StatsByCube

Post by Duncan P »

Don't forget that "Stored Calculated Cells" can include C level cells (including pure consolidations) - which can't be fed anyway. Also it doesn't include any cells the calculation of which fell below the CalculationThresholdForStorage. Finally it won't include any cells which haven't yet been used.
EvgenyT
Community Contributor
Posts: 324
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 9:39 pm
OLAP Product: TM1
Version: PAL 2.0.8
Excel Version: 2016
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: }StatsByCube

Post by EvgenyT »

Thank you for your input. I just wanted to see what are the relationships between Number of Stored Calculated Cells and Number of Fed Cells and weather it can be useful for determining over/under feeding
Post Reply