When I am summing the element values at leaf level(N), if any of the elements are null it is not summing up. Can anyone help me on this.
['After Adj'] =N:['B4 Hedg'] + ['Prior Adj'];
in some cases ['Prior Adj] is having no values, at that juncture that the result is yeilding null/0. Actually it should yeild the value of ['B4 Hedge'] in the cell ['After Adj']
Please help me..
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 7:26 am
- OLAP Product: IBM PA Local
- Version: 2.0.7
- Excel Version: 2016
Please help me..
Last edited by ram3sh on Thu May 26, 2011 5:01 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:29 pm
- OLAP Product: TM1
- Version: 9.4
- Excel Version: 2007
Re: Please help me..
Any reason you're not using a hierarchy for this instead of rules?
Steve
Steve
- Michel Zijlema
- Site Admin
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 5:22 am
- OLAP Product: TM1, PALO
- Version: both 2.5 and higher
- Excel Version: 2003-2007-2010
- Location: Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Please help me..
Just like Steve I'm wondering whether there's anything stopping you from using a consolidated element instead of the sum in the rule.
Are you using SKIPCHECK/FEEDERS? If so, what is the feeder for the rule? Could it be you're feeding from ['Prior Adjustment'] only?
Is the ['Prior Adjustment'] element in itself a rule calculated element? If so, what is the calculation (and feeder) for this element?
Michel
Are you using SKIPCHECK/FEEDERS? If so, what is the feeder for the rule? Could it be you're feeding from ['Prior Adjustment'] only?
Is the ['Prior Adjustment'] element in itself a rule calculated element? If so, what is the calculation (and feeder) for this element?
Michel
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 7:26 am
- OLAP Product: IBM PA Local
- Version: 2.0.7
- Excel Version: 2016
Re: Please help me..
ThanQ Michel, it worked when I have included elements in @ Feeders.
- Martin Ryan
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 9:08 am
- OLAP Product: TM1
- Version: 10.1
- Excel Version: 2010
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
- Contact:
Re: Please help me..
As pointed out by both Steve and Michel you'd be better to do this using a consolidation in the dimension instead of a rule. It's faster, clearer and will apply automatically to any cube that uses the dimension.
Martin
Martin
Please do not send technical questions via private message or email. Post them in the forum where you'll probably get a faster reply, and everyone can benefit from the answers.
Jodi Ryan Family Lawyer
Jodi Ryan Family Lawyer
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6643
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 2:30 am
- OLAP Product: TM1
- Version: PA2.0.9.18 Classic NO PAW!
- Excel Version: 2013 and Office 365
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Please help me..
It may work, but rules are considerably less efficient than consolidations. You should always opt for the latter if you have a choice.ram3sh wrote:ThanQ Michel, it worked when I have included elements in @ Feeders.
{Edit: Martin beat me to it by a minute, but I'll leave this post here for emphasis.}
"To them, equipment failure is terrifying. To me, it’s 'Tuesday.' "
-----------
Before posting, please check the documentation, the FAQ, the Search function and FOR THE LOVE OF GLUB the Request Guidelines.
-----------
Before posting, please check the documentation, the FAQ, the Search function and FOR THE LOVE OF GLUB the Request Guidelines.