1. Turbo Integrator Processes
2. Subsets
3. Cubeviews
4. Application folders
either with TI process or excel spreadsheet (that is without having to take down the server)
![Question :?:](./images/smilies/icon_question.gif)
Not that I'm aware of. We worked quite closely with IBM when I was with a UK bank and were constantly moaning about this. The best we could hope for was getting some documentation on the API so we could write our own stuff - though that was slow coming too, in fact I'm not sure if it's arrived yet.John Hammond wrote:Does anyone know if IBM are planning to fix the requirement to bring the server down everytime you need to promote a TI. (All along with having to notify
users, last warnings and email comms etc etc)
It would be very simple to put a 'Refresh from disk' option on each TI process.
IBM this would be a collosal improvement in usability for very little effort.
No it doesn't; I've checked that in 8.2.12, 9.0 and 9.5.John Hammond wrote:Anyone tried using Cubewise's solution or know how much it costs? If a cubewise rep wants to PM me that's fine if that is within forum protocols.
It seems that you get the worst of both worlds with TM1.
If you copy a .pro into the TM1 directory - it will not load the new copy into memory.
If you accidentally DELETE a .pro from the TM1 directory - it removes the copy it has in memory !
That sounds like a challenge...Martin Ryan wrote:Not that I'm aware of. We worked quite closely with IBM when I was with a UK bank and were constantly moaning about this. The best we could hope for was getting some documentation on the API so we could write our own stuff - though that was slow coming too, in fact I'm not sure if it's arrived yet.John Hammond wrote:Does anyone know if IBM are planning to fix the requirement to bring the server down everytime you need to promote a TI. (All along with having to notify
users, last warnings and email comms etc etc)
It would be very simple to put a 'Refresh from disk' option on each TI process.
IBM this would be a collosal improvement in usability for very little effort.
It's gonna be a blast to do, I can't WAIT!Theoretical future support request, translated from compiled diplomatic language to raw assembly code wrote:"The ****ing API documentation doesn't cover the SetBlahBlah function (naturally!, Like I'd expect anything else!) but when I call the GetBlahBlah function I get a TM1ValTypeString value capsule so WHY ISN'T THE %^%$ING WRITEBACK WORKING WHEN I PASS A CAPSULE OF THAT TYPE???!!!"
Wouldn't surprise me if it hasn't. I can't fathom why (with the exception of single cell copy and paste) here still isn't functionality equivalent to Beachware / SPF copy and paste built in. It's been an obvious design oversight for ages.George Regateiro wrote:The entire hot promotion was a big thing that they were pushing at the Forum 2 years ago but all that talked seemed to have died (this was pre integration into C8 and planning). When we looked into the cubewise offerings I specifically asked the IBM reps that we were working with and it was indicated to me at the time that there were no plans to introduce similar functionality in the near future that competed with vizier. If that has changed or not in the last year is anyones guess.