Search found 18 matches
- Mon Sep 19, 2022 4:36 am
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Prop. Spread on calculated C-Element
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2741
Prop. Spread on calculated C-Element
Hey together, actual having an issue with my rule / porportional data spread. My example cube is simple, just 2D with 3 measures and a time-dimension with 12 month and a year element. Screenshot.png My rule: ['REQ'] = C: (['UMS-RED-Betrag-vK'] - ['UMS-RED-Betrag-ez']) \ ['UMS-RED-Betrag-vK']; ['UMS-...
- Mon Jan 04, 2021 12:38 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: OPS Conosle CubeCellPickListGet Problem
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2169
Re: OPS Conosle CubeCellPickListGet Problem
Hi,
happy new year and sorry for the late reply.
Any other suggentions?
happy new year and sorry for the late reply.
There are no hidden Tabs.Open the Excel file and check for hidden tabs that start with "Picklist***" in the name. You should delete these.
Any other suggentions?
- Thu Dec 17, 2020 10:39 am
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: OPS Conosle CubeCellPickListGet Problem
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2169
OPS Conosle CubeCellPickListGet Problem
Hi togehter, I have a strange issue on one of my perspective reports in Excel. In some situations (scrolling / clicking in a Cell) TM1 is starting to calculate something even though the automatic Excel calculations are switched off. The OPS Console shows in this moments "CubeCellPickListGet&quo...
- Mon Nov 16, 2020 12:24 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: MTQ
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3237
Re: MTQ
Hi again, so this seems to be the important part here: The number of threads you have depends on the number of cores in your CPU. Each CPU core can have two threads. So a processor with two cores will have four threads. A processor with eight cores will have 16 threads. -> My max MTQ limit is 32, be...
- Thu Nov 12, 2020 4:44 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: MTQ
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3237
Re: MTQ
Hi lotsaram,
thanks for your reply. Yes, I know the possibilities how to config the MTQ parameter. My question is more about the specs for the Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU I posted. I'm not sure about the definition what MTQ can use here as parameter. The 16 cores or the 32 logical processors?
Thanks
thanks for your reply. Yes, I know the possibilities how to config the MTQ parameter. My question is more about the specs for the Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU I posted. I'm not sure about the definition what MTQ can use here as parameter. The 16 cores or the 32 logical processors?
Thanks
- Thu Nov 12, 2020 9:57 am
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: MTQ
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3237
MTQ
Hi together, I've a short question about how to figure out the max possible MTQ value for the TM1s.cfg. The servers hardware is the following: Prozessor Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v2 @ 3.30GHz, 3300 MHz, 8 Kern(e), 16 logische(r) Prozessor(en) Prozessor Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v2 @ 3.30GHz, 3...
- Tue Apr 28, 2020 1:27 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: ConsolidatedMax
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7541
Re: ConsolidatedMax
Hi, Hi Markus, thanks for your reply. Yes, my "solution" is a mix of both, consolidatedmax & consolidate children. Definitely very ugly, but it seems to work. It's going something like this: IF(DTYPE( 'WS_POS', !WS_POS) @= 'C' & DTYPE('WS_Marke', !WS_Marke) @= 'N' & DTYPE('WS_W...
- Mon Apr 27, 2020 7:05 am
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: ConsolidatedMax
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7541
Re: ConsolidatedMax
Hi Markus, thanks for your reply. Yes, my "solution" is a mix of both, consolidatedmax & consolidate children. Definitely very ugly, but it seems to work. It's going something like this: IF(DTYPE( 'WS_POS', !WS_POS) @= 'C' & DTYPE('WS_Marke', !WS_Marke) @= 'N' & DTYPE('WS_Waren...
- Tue Apr 21, 2020 8:28 am
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: ConsolidatedMax
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7541
Re: ConsolidatedMax
Hi ascheevel, thanks for your reply! I've already tested some workarounds, but all of them are getting nasty in some ways. I guess your idea will go in the same direction. In total I have to handel 12 Dimensions with that requirement and of course there are some exceptions, where the rule should not...
- Mon Apr 20, 2020 2:02 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: ConsolidatedMax
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7541
Re: ConsolidatedMax
No one? No ideas or hints?
- Wed Apr 15, 2020 6:12 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: ConsolidatedMax
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7541
ConsolidatedMax
Hi all, i've got a problem with using ConsolidatedMax in a Rule. Let's say my Cube is 3d with the Dimensions WS_POS, WS_Zeit and WS_Kennzahl and whenever I look at a C-Element in my WS_POS Dimension, I want to see the Max value. My rule is like: ['WE-EB-Option'] = IF(DTYPE( 'WS_POS', !WS_POS) @= 'C'...
- Fri Feb 28, 2020 8:15 am
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Feeder from one n-elenemt to many n-elemets
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4288
Re: Feeder from one n-elenemt to many n-elemets
Hi Wim, the Cube isn't really just 2D, that was just for the example. So I really have to use feeders. Yes, your second suggestion ist the way I wanted to prevent in some cases :) I really like your third point, because I dindn't know that by feeding a consolidation the children automatically gets t...
- Thu Feb 27, 2020 1:56 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Feeder from one n-elenemt to many n-elemets
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4288
Re: Feeder from one n-elenemt to many n-elemets
Hi,
the value there can be a general input parameter and then should be passed to the other elements. I know, there can be other possibilities, but this way is given for me.
Thanks for the advice with dimnm & dimix.
the value there can be a general input parameter and then should be passed to the other elements. I know, there can be other possibilities, but this way is given for me.
Thanks for the advice with dimnm & dimix.
- Thu Feb 27, 2020 1:19 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Feeder from one n-elenemt to many n-elemets
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4288
Feeder from one n-elenemt to many n-elemets
Hi together, I've a problem with feeding cells and need help to find the correct feeder. Example: My Cube has 2 Dimensions, Measures und WS_Time. The Time Dimension (WS_Time) has 3 n-elements: 1. 20200100 2. 20200200 3. Sum 2020 and the rule is like: ['measure x'] = IF( SUBST( DIMNM( 'WS_Zeit', DIMI...
- Mon Jan 20, 2020 2:48 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Protect DBRW fomrula in Perspectives
- Replies: 8
- Views: 5316
Re: Protect DBRW fomrula in Perspectives
Hi Paul,
thank you very much for your response!
Unfortunately TM1 Web is no option because of performance issues.
Guess I will try to handle it with the VBA approach.
Regards
TM1NB
thank you very much for your response!
Unfortunately TM1 Web is no option because of performance issues.
Guess I will try to handle it with the VBA approach.
Regards
TM1NB
- Wed Jan 15, 2020 1:21 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Protect DBRW fomrula in Perspectives
- Replies: 8
- Views: 5316
Re: Protect DBRW fomrula in Perspectives
Hi Tomok, sorry for my bad description/english. My idea was about creating a new column without any formulas (so there is nothing that could be deleted by mistake) with the intention to let them put their plan values in those new cells... But this is not possible because the value of the first cell ...
- Wed Jan 15, 2020 11:45 am
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Protect DBRW fomrula in Perspectives
- Replies: 8
- Views: 5316
Re: Protect DBRW fomrula in Perspectives
Thanks for the quick response. Yes, the report is already stored in the applications folder and can always be used as master. Nevertheless the requirement is unfortunatly like "there must be a possibility to always have the correct formula" in the backround without "repopen" the ...
- Wed Jan 15, 2020 8:34 am
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Protect DBRW fomrula in Perspectives
- Replies: 8
- Views: 5316
Protect DBRW fomrula in Perspectives
Hi,
I'am looking for a simple way to protect DBRW formula in perspectives. The cells must still be wirteable, so that Users can type in their plan values without the risk of deleting the DBRW formula in it.
Thanks
TM1NB
I'am looking for a simple way to protect DBRW formula in perspectives. The cells must still be wirteable, so that Users can type in their plan values without the risk of deleting the DBRW formula in it.
Thanks
TM1NB