Search found 1763 matches
- Wed Jul 30, 2025 3:12 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Wrap Text Row dimension element names in PAW
- Replies: 2
- Views: 51592
Re: Wrap Text Row dimension element names in PAW
In the latest versions of PAW you would right click on the row header and then select "Format Manager" > "Header" - in the screen that pops up you can select "Wrap Text without Line Break" or "Wrap Text with Line Break" (assuming its unlikely you have line bre...
- Sun Jul 13, 2025 9:16 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Updating Dimension Data via PAW Using Sets – Issue with Element Weights Not Copying
- Replies: 1
- Views: 19922
Re: Updating Dimension Data via PAW Using Sets – Issue with Element Weights Not Copying
Presumably in your TI process it is using the DimensionElementComponentAdd function (or HierarchyElementComponentAdd - the logic is the same) where you specify the parent and child elements that will form the relationship, the number at the end of that function is the weight which will be applied to...
- Sun Jun 01, 2025 10:41 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: install PAW in windows server 2019
- Replies: 5
- Views: 10110
Re: install PAW in windows server 2019
How long did you wait to see if it started up before going for the reinstall? It's normal for that screen to appear when starting the PAW services and can remain there for a while if the server doesn't have a lot of resources. What are the specs of the server you are installing it on? And is there a...
- Fri Feb 28, 2025 7:54 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Rule Efficiency
- Replies: 8
- Views: 34388
Re: Rule Efficiency
Interesting I will cede to standing knowledge if the DB is usually significantly slower. I was basing it on a fairly small test case I had done (all in one model) where there are a lot of hierarchies with same named elements (between hierarchies and dimensions unfortunately) - so it probably skewed ...
- Tue Feb 25, 2025 3:08 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Rule Efficiency
- Replies: 8
- Views: 34388
Re: Rule Efficiency
It does look redundant. The only reason I can think of to write the rule that way would be if you wanted to keep the cell editable so users can add a value in this cube for the non rule-derived cases. E.g. if a % has been provided in the master cube we will use that one; otherwise users should/can a...
- Tue Feb 25, 2025 1:38 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Rule Efficiency
- Replies: 8
- Views: 34388
Re: Rule Efficiency
Hi, I don't get why the DB is needed in the above rule, so I was thinking this would be better: Technically it terms of performance DB performs slightly better than shorthand; you are unlikely to notice any difference from changing just 1 rule but it could add up if its every rule in a rule heavy s...
- Fri Jan 03, 2025 3:28 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Tm1 free Download?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 10822
Re: Tm1 free Download?
Not the perfect option for the average person just wanting to learn but in terms of wanting to create/contribute to open source projects etc. my understanding is that IBM made access to the "Software Access Catalogue" free for IBM partners at some point over the last few years. I'm not sur...
- Tue Dec 17, 2024 9:22 am
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Zero out with DBS on consolidated element
- Replies: 7
- Views: 10818
Re: Zero out with DBS on consolidated element
The DBS formula is cell specific so when you try updating the consolidation it is only trying to update that cell and it finds that it is a consolidation which means it is non updateable. When you manually type into the cell with something like "C" or "S0" you are actually callin...
- Mon Sep 30, 2024 6:49 am
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: SingleCommit with MultipleCommit
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8987
Re: SingleCommit with MultipleCommit
The difference is a commit step after each of the TIs, or only 1 commit after all TIs are finished. With one potential "gotcha" proviso; it only applies to TI processes which are called from the chore itself. If you have to call (say) an upload process a variable number of times, and ther...
- Sat Jul 20, 2024 8:26 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Excluding elements with wildcard search
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3228
Re: Excluding elements with wildcard search
Hi, As you have found; subsets are just a list of members - but it is just a pre-applied "selection" of members within the dimension. The user is still interacting with the dimension; so the second they make any sort of change (e.g. expanding or collapsing a consolidation) they are no long...
- Sun Jul 14, 2024 9:16 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Distributing String Values Within a Cube
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4062
Re: Distributing String Values Within a Cube
If this wasn't a control dimension; you could add a consolidation to the }clients dimension and feed that - feeding a consolidation is essentially just shorthand for feeding every N-level element under the consolidation. However, I would not recommend it with a control dimension (you can add consoli...
- Mon Jun 24, 2024 11:25 am
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: mdx statement to determine parent from parallel hierarchy
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3301
Re: mdx statement to determine parent from parallel hierarchy
The below code concept should work for you. Generate ( {TM1SubsetToSet([<Dim1>].[<Hier1>] , "N_Level_Set" , "Public")}, {StrToMember ( "[<Dim2>].[<Hier2>].[P" + Right ( [<Dim1>].[<Hier1>].CurrentMember.Properties("Member_Name"), 6 ) + "]" )} ) Genera...
- Fri Jun 21, 2024 6:14 am
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Use of + in Element names
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1818
Re: Use of + in Element names
I've never used it as an actual element name; but I regularly use "-" as a calculated member in MDX views to create spacing rows and columns.
I've never had any issues with that in PAW or PAFE.
I've never had any issues with that in PAW or PAFE.
- Fri May 31, 2024 3:30 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Average calculation using TI process
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3572
Re: Average calculation using TI process
Looking at the requirement I would probably be inclined to just go with a couple of while loops as a simple implementation; then check that the performance is good/acceptable - if its not I would investigate other options. I gather from your query that if the target range is Jan - Dec; the Jan shoul...
- Fri May 24, 2024 9:25 am
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Block user in PAL
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7078
Re: Block user in PAL
Hi,
I haven't used it in a while but there is an "IsDisabled" flag in the }ClientProperties cube.
If you put a 1 in there it should stop the user from being able to connect.
Thanks,
Declan
I haven't used it in a while but there is an "IsDisabled" flag in the }ClientProperties cube.
If you put a 1 in there it should stop the user from being able to connect.
Thanks,
Declan
- Wed Nov 29, 2023 6:01 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Prerequisites and Challenges: PAW installation
- Replies: 6
- Views: 11824
Re: Prerequisites and Challenges: PAW installation
This is one of those rock and a hard place requirements. It would be impossible for IBM or anyone to say that it is impossible to get viruses or issues in a certain place. Now to run on windows you should exclude it (depending on virus software used) to guarantee a good service level. So then if an ...
- Sat Nov 11, 2023 7:14 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Unable to ViewZeroOut }bedrock.cube.view.create
- Replies: 3
- Views: 9471
Re: Unable to ViewZeroOut }bedrock.cube.view.create
I haven’t used the bedrock processes before but looking at the parameters you are passing a 1 to a “temp” parameter. So most likely this is creating the views as temporary views which get destroyed at the end of the thread. In the earliest release that included the temp option it could only be used ...
- Fri Nov 10, 2023 12:03 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: MDX With Member Dynamic
- Replies: 10
- Views: 16882
Re: MDX With Member Dynamic
Good information Declan. In the first code snippet, I would calculate the variance based on the 2 variables above. Less hardcoded elements, shorter code too. Yes, that's what the second code snippet was showing how to do. However, it's only really needed because of the issues that Maren has encount...
- Thu Nov 09, 2023 9:01 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: MDX With Member Dynamic
- Replies: 10
- Views: 16882
Re: MDX With Member Dynamic
Hi Maren, What you've described shouldn't be an issue at all. I would suggest raising an incident with IBM to see if there are issues with the version you are running; I do a lot of period comparisons very similar to what you have described that have worked for a number of years. I built a small moc...
- Wed Nov 08, 2023 10:04 am
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Dynamic subset - Reference cube with different Dimensions
- Replies: 2
- Views: 8492
Re: Dynamic subset - Reference cube with different Dimensions
So first thing when you want to retrieve the value in a cell you need to get it in format: [cubename].([dimname1].[elementname1],[dimname2].[elementname2]…) The concatenation of dim name and element name above is a member unique name (you can also add an extra square bracket in the middle with hiera...