Rule Performance Tuning

tomok
MVP
Posts: 2836
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 2:39 pm
OLAP Product: TM1, Palo
Version: Beginning of time thru 10.2
Excel Version: 2003-2007-2010-2013
Location: Atlanta, GA
Contact:

Re: Rule Performance Tuning

Post by tomok »

beek wrote:We are having both actual & forecasted data in the cube. For actualised weeks, data will be imported from the ERP system. For forecasted weeks, it will be computed (carried from week's inventory)
For inventory, I cant think of any way to "downsize" the rule/feeder. Hence am looking at Sales computation. If I put a IF to check on the year, will this shorten the feeder time?
Do you have a version dimension or something like that to delineate between Actual and Forecast. If so, why have you not referenced that in this rule?

Code: Select all

['Qty'] =>['Sales'];
There usually is no need to feed Actuals because they are generally static numbers. The above feeder statement is going to feed both Actual and Forecast.
Tom O'Kelley - Manager Finance Systems
American Tower
http://www.onlinecourtreservations.com/
beek
Posts: 63
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 3:10 am
OLAP Product: TM1
Version: PA 2.0
Excel Version: Office 365

Re: Rule Performance Tuning

Post by beek »

Seem I can try out what Steve suggested. Let me try out few rules, and see if the memory consumption as well as the cube loading time is smaller.
To Tomok,
There's Setting cube controls whether has the week turns actualised or not.
User avatar
Steve Rowe
Site Admin
Posts: 2456
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 4:25 pm
OLAP Product: TM1
Version: TM1 v6,v7,v8,v9,v10,v11+PAW
Excel Version: Nearly all of them

Re: Rule Performance Tuning

Post by Steve Rowe »

Beeks,
Tomoks point is a good one.

Normally in the actual part of s system sales would be loaded data.

In the planning side it could be ruled as price*quantity

So Tomok is querying if your Qty=>sales feeder should be active across all versions.

Cheers
Technical Director
www.infocat.co.uk
Post Reply