Strange behaviour of Subsets used in DBRW

Post Reply
hju
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 8:01 pm
OLAP Product: TM1 / PA
Version: 11 (PA 2.0)
Excel Version: 2010

Strange behaviour of Subsets used in DBRW

Post by hju »

Hi all,
we are facing a strange behaviour of subsets used in DBRW in Perspectives (not PAX as mentioned here)

TM1-Version is PA2.0 (Product version 11.8.01000.6)

The application uses subsets (filters) defined by users to get sums and list of elements. Everything went fine so far for years.
- A single subset is created via TI with specified elements.
- The subset is accessible as pseudo consolidation (described here) in TM1Web (sum via DBRW) and CubeViewer and perspectives

Now we enhanced the feature to enable the user to create multiple subset (around 5 to 15) in on step (just a loop over the existing process)

Everything works as expected
- All subsets are created with the specified elements
- all subset are accessible as pseudo-consolidation in CubeViewer and TM1WEB retrieving the sum

BUT:
In Perspectives itself we encounter the following cases (independent of the number of subsets created in one loop)
- all subsets created in the loop are available via DBRW (works as expected)
- all subsets created in the loop show *KEY_ERR (but they exist and can be evaluated via CubeViewer or TM1Web as pseudo-consolidation)
There is no real pattern in this. All names are valid, no errors, all subsets have elements

ADDITIONAL:
After some hours (here observed: 2,5h), the subsets producing *KEY_ERR earlier are now working as expected in perspectives (no more *KEY_ERR)

We tried so far with no effekt:
- SaveDataAll
- Reload/Rebuild of sheet
- Closing perspectives worksheet and reopening

Anyone observed this before?
Any hints?

Sincerly
Holger
User avatar
gtonkin
MVP
Posts: 1204
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 3:03 pm
OLAP Product: TM1
Version: Latest and greatest
Excel Version: Office 365 64-bit
Location: JHB, South Africa
Contact:

Re: Strange behaviour of Subsets used in DBRW

Post by gtonkin »

What happens if you create the new sets, close Perspectives and Excel then open and connect again?
Could be a meta data sync issue where new objects are not available/recognized.
hju
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 8:01 pm
OLAP Product: TM1 / PA
Version: 11 (PA 2.0)
Excel Version: 2010

Re: Strange behaviour of Subsets used in DBRW

Post by hju »

gtonkin wrote: Mon Feb 06, 2023 12:03 pm What happens if you create the new sets, close Perspectives and Excel then open and connect again?
Could be a meta data sync issue where new objects are not available/recognized.
Hi gtonkin,
my users checked it and i think you got it. After completely closing and reconnect all subsets can be adressed.
Indeed seems to be a sync issue.
Strange that it occures only sometimes...

Is there a way to to force a resync by ti (somthing like RefreshMdxHierarchy for cognos) ?
Maybe a client configuration issue in perspectives?

Thanks in advance
User avatar
gtonkin
MVP
Posts: 1204
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 3:03 pm
OLAP Product: TM1
Version: Latest and greatest
Excel Version: Office 365 64-bit
Location: JHB, South Africa
Contact:

Re: Strange behaviour of Subsets used in DBRW

Post by gtonkin »

I have used M_Clear in macro code previously but has some additional erratic behaviour like suddenly having your connection close.

Hopefully someone else has a better alternative…
burnstripe
Regular Participant
Posts: 198
Joined: Wed May 06, 2020 2:58 pm
OLAP Product: Planning Analytics
Version: 2.0.9
Excel Version: 2016

Re: Strange behaviour of Subsets used in DBRW

Post by burnstripe »

long shot, does the tm1p.ini refer to DimensionDownloadMaxSize? If so try removing it.
hju
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 8:01 pm
OLAP Product: TM1 / PA
Version: 11 (PA 2.0)
Excel Version: 2010

Re: Strange behaviour of Subsets used in DBRW

Post by hju »

Hi burnstripe,
the DimensionDownloadMaxSize parameter im tm1p.ini has no value assigned. Nevertheless the users removed the line and did a test.
Sadly there was no positve effect... :(

Any further ideas on how to solve this sync-issue are welcome...
Post Reply