Just curious if anyone has encountered this TM1 10.2 always asking to save an untouched TI process before closing it?
We had existing TIs from our separate server which is 10.1.1. I copied some and tried to do my dev in my new server but I noticed that behavior. I thought maybe it was just because I copied the process that is previously 10.1.1 and opened it to 10.2, But no. I tried to create a new process in this 10.2 using a database table as a source but the behavior still exists. I also tried in the samples provided in the install.
I see this as well, very annoying. I don't know what the reason is but I blame Performance Modeler! (joking, but it sounds good, isn't it? )
Best regards,
Wim Gielis
IBM Champion 2024-2025
Excel Most Valuable Professional, 2011-2014 https://www.wimgielis.com ==> 121 TM1 articles and a lot of custom code
Newest blog article: Deleting elements quickly
I would blame Performance Muddler as well. After running a training course on it last week I can confirm (based on delegate feedback) that it is the root of all evil!!!
Struggling through the quagmire of life to reach the other side of who knows where. Go Build a PC Jimbo PC Builds on YouTube OS: Mac OS 11 PA Version: 2.0.7
I'd still blame PM as we've already established it's to blame for everything.
Struggling through the quagmire of life to reach the other side of who knows where. Go Build a PC Jimbo PC Builds on YouTube OS: Mac OS 11 PA Version: 2.0.7
If already this topic: I recently experienced that opening a TI process from Architect takes ca. 30 secs (working remotely on the server) and I think it happens since we added the terminal server role in addition to the application server, however it is rather just a feeling that adding the terminal server role and the long time opening the TI are in correlation.
Has anyone seen this before?
mvaspal wrote:If already this topic: I recently experienced that opening a TI process from Architect takes ca. 30 secs (working remotely on the server) and I think it happens since we added the terminal server role in addition to the application server, however it is rather just a feeling that adding the terminal server role and the long time opening the TI are in correlation.
Has anyone seen this before?
Version 10.1.1 FP1.
No, but I think the key pieces of missing information are... what's the data source? Have you modified it? If it's ODBC how long does it take to open the query using something like the Microsoft Query tool? If it's a text file has the size of the file changed.
jim wood wrote:I'd still blame PM as we've already established it's to blame for everything.
Personally I tend to blame what it's written in, not just how it's written.
Because that way I cover both Insight and the Applications Portal, too...
Where's the like button, where is it, oh wrong site....
Struggling through the quagmire of life to reach the other side of who knows where. Go Build a PC Jimbo PC Builds on YouTube OS: Mac OS 11 PA Version: 2.0.7
)
