quick contributor commands and transaction log

Post Reply
User avatar
ioscat
Regular Participant
Posts: 209
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 8:26 am
OLAP Product: Contributor
Version: 9.5.2 10.1.1 10.2
Excel Version: 07+10+13
Contact:

quick contributor commands and transaction log

Post by ioscat »

is it possible to get information what does user exactly enter to cell? We got user with values 4,..... E+180. But we don't think She entered 4.........0000...0000 (180 zeroes). We suppose she entered something like 4...E... that was a mistake of course. Transaction don't provide information about this only final value.
User avatar
qml
MVP
Posts: 1098
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:01 pm
OLAP Product: TM1 / Planning Analytics
Version: 2.0.9 and all previous
Excel Version: 2007 - 2016
Location: London, UK, Europe

Re: quick contributor commands and transaction log

Post by qml »

No, TM1 doesn't record how a user entered the value they entered. Whether they did it by inputting a single figure, using data spreading or a keyboard shortcut, you will only be able to see the end result, I'm afraid.
Kamil Arendt
lotsaram
MVP
Posts: 3706
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 11:14 am
OLAP Product: TableManager1
Version: PA 2.0.x
Excel Version: Office 365
Location: Switzerland

Re: quick contributor commands and transaction log

Post by lotsaram »

ioscat wrote:is it possible to get information what does user exactly enter to cell? We got user with values 4,..... E+180. But we don't think She entered 4.........0000...0000 (180 zeroes). We suppose she entered something like 4...E... that was a mistake of course. Transaction don't provide information about this only final value.
I think your guess is a pretty good one that the user entered 4e180. I can't think of any other way to achieve that result.
User avatar
qml
MVP
Posts: 1098
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:01 pm
OLAP Product: TM1 / Planning Analytics
Version: 2.0.9 and all previous
Excel Version: 2007 - 2016
Location: London, UK, Europe

Re: quick contributor commands and transaction log

Post by qml »

lotsaram wrote:I think your guess is a pretty good one that the user entered 4e180. I can't think of any other way to achieve that result.
Especially that E is right under 4 on the keyboard, so it's easy to press these two keys together. Solution? Tell users to use the numeric pad on the right side of the keyboard! ;)
Kamil Arendt
Post Reply