Does anyone know the answer to this? I would be grateful for guidance.
In a rule which has no statements other than an inter-cube feeder, is "SKIPCHECK" still required?
Regards, Ian
SKIPCHECK in inter-cube FEEDER only rule?
-
- Community Contributor
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:44 am
- OLAP Product: TM1
- Version: 9 + 10 + Plan An
- Excel Version: All
- Location: Isle of Wight, UK
SKIPCHECK in inter-cube FEEDER only rule?
"the earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens" - Baha'u'llah
- Steve Rowe
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 4:25 pm
- OLAP Product: TM1
- Version: TM1 v6,v7,v8,v9,v10,v11+PAW
- Excel Version: Nearly all of them
Re: SKIPCHECK in inter-cube FEEDER only rule?
I'm not sure but I don't think you do yourself harm by having skipcheck in place given that you have a rule sheet anyway
Technical Director
www.infocat.co.uk
www.infocat.co.uk
-
- Regular Participant
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 10:49 am
- OLAP Product: Cognos TM1
- Version: 9.4.1 - 10.1
- Excel Version: 2003 and 2007
Re: SKIPCHECK in inter-cube FEEDER only rule?
I seemed to remember reading that it was required. Here's the post I was thinking of:iansdigby wrote:Does anyone know the answer to this? I would be grateful for guidance.
In a rule which has no statements other than an inter-cube feeder, is "SKIPCHECK" still required?
Regards, Ian
http://www.tm1forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=50
This may have changed in the interim but easy enough to test I suppose.
Out of interest, why would you want to avoid using Skipheck? Given there are no rules that need to be fed in your cube, is there any overhead to having Skipcheck switched on?
-
- Community Contributor
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:44 am
- OLAP Product: TM1
- Version: 9 + 10 + Plan An
- Excel Version: All
- Location: Isle of Wight, UK
Re: SKIPCHECK in inter-cube FEEDER only rule?
Thanks for the feedback all.
asutcliffe, there isn't any reason for me to avoid putting skipcheck in: I was just posing the question:
- out of interest because I couldn't see the logic one way or the other
- because I wanted to eliminate that as a possible reason for some issues I am working through
No doubt there is a programming logic but I can happily acquiesce for now.
SKIPCHECK goes in!
Ian
asutcliffe, there isn't any reason for me to avoid putting skipcheck in: I was just posing the question:
- out of interest because I couldn't see the logic one way or the other
- because I wanted to eliminate that as a possible reason for some issues I am working through
No doubt there is a programming logic but I can happily acquiesce for now.
SKIPCHECK goes in!
Ian
"the earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens" - Baha'u'llah