Hi All,
I have a fairly large dimension with about 10,000 n-elements. Each of these has a specific attribute which is used elsewhere within TI processes and rules.
Since the attribute is very important, it is not to be changed by any user, only the ADMIN user.
However I have noticed that despite setting security for all Client Groups within the }ElementAttribute_Dimension control cube, to READ, it reverts back to WRITE after I save the change, meaning the user can still change the attribute via a DBRA formula on a spreadsheet.
I have read that there maybe a conflict around the fact that the cube this dimension belongs to requires users to have WRITE access but I am a little perplexed as to whether this maybe a bug or something else.
If any of you have seen this before I would be grateful for some insights.
BTW - using normal editors to update security
Thanks
Ajay
}ElementAttribute_Dimension
- Martin Ryan
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 9:08 am
- OLAP Product: TM1
- Version: 10.1
- Excel Version: 2010
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
- Contact:
Re: }ElementAttribute_Dimension
Two things spring to mind, first is that it's possible you have a rule on your }Cube_Security cube. More likely is that you've given users 'WRITE' access to the dimension. Give them 'READ' access to the dimension instead (but write access to the elements within the dimension. This is the default unless you set up element security on the dim).
Martin
Martin
Please do not send technical questions via private message or email. Post them in the forum where you'll probably get a faster reply, and everyone can benefit from the answers.
Jodi Ryan Family Lawyer
Jodi Ryan Family Lawyer
- Ajay
- Regular Participant
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 8:27 am
- OLAP Product: TM1
- Version: 10.2.0, PA 2.0.9
- Excel Version: 2016
- Location: London
Re: }ElementAttribute_Dimension
Hi Martin
No joy I'm afraid.
There is no rule on the }Cube_Security cube, and when I gave users the READ access they were still able to change the attribute through the DBRA formulae
Ajay
No joy I'm afraid.
There is no rule on the }Cube_Security cube, and when I gave users the READ access they were still able to change the attribute through the DBRA formulae
Ajay
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6647
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 2:30 am
- OLAP Product: TM1
- Version: PA2.0.9.18 Classic NO PAW!
- Excel Version: 2013 and Office 365
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact:
Re: }ElementAttribute_Dimension
I'd be inclined to check (and if necessary change) the access by browsing the }Cube_Security cube itself. It's possibly some funkiness with the GUI.Ajay wrote: There is no rule on the }Cube_Security cube, and when I gave users the READ access they were still able to change the attribute through the DBRA formulae
After that I'd reboot the server; I've found that sometimes access changes don't stick until it's freshly loaded, but it tends to be an intermittent issue. Running a TI calling the SecurityRefresh function may be enough, but a reboot would be safer.
I haven't encountered an issue where users who really do have only read access to the attributes cube can write to it, though bear in mind that TM1 uses the least restrictive model; no group should have write access to the cube. (The Admin group has it implicitly regardless of what you set (or try to set) the access to.)
"To them, equipment failure is terrifying. To me, it’s 'Tuesday.' "
-----------
Before posting, please check the documentation, the FAQ, the Search function and FOR THE LOVE OF GLUB the Request Guidelines.
-----------
Before posting, please check the documentation, the FAQ, the Search function and FOR THE LOVE OF GLUB the Request Guidelines.
- Ajay
- Regular Participant
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 8:27 am
- OLAP Product: TM1
- Version: 10.2.0, PA 2.0.9
- Excel Version: 2016
- Location: London
Re: }ElementAttribute_Dimension
Thanks Alan
Unfortunately, it didn't work.
So I've had to put a work around in place using a secondary dimension which holds the untouchable attribute value which is used in the Rules and TI that are dependent upon it.
Thanks all for the assitance
Ajay
Unfortunately, it didn't work.
So I've had to put a work around in place using a secondary dimension which holds the untouchable attribute value which is used in the Rules and TI that are dependent upon it.
Thanks all for the assitance
Ajay