Search found 120 matches
- Fri Jul 01, 2016 8:16 am
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: When to use a new TM1-instance?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2921
When to use a new TM1-instance?
Hello everyone, Do you have any advice on when to use several TM1 instance (model, server whatever you call it) instead of just using one massive one? I'm currently rebuilding my new employers TM1-monster and adding a lot of much needed functionality to it. This of course makes a fairly large model ...
- Wed Jun 29, 2016 6:16 am
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Long Start Up time after a crash
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3909
Re: Long Start Up time after a crash
How large is the model when it is fully loaded?
- Sun May 22, 2016 9:39 am
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Editing code... your preferred way?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 9675
Re: Editing code... your preferred way?
Most of the time I use Performance Modeler when editing rules. Most of my old colleagues laughed at me for doing so, but I just find it to be the middle way between having a good editor such as Notepad++ and something that can compile and test the code such as Architect. I do find myself writing the...
- Tue May 10, 2016 3:53 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Disable logging specific TI process in tm1s-log.properties
- Replies: 33
- Views: 20963
Re: Disable logging specific TI process in tm1s-log.properties
Use your last breath and file it as a bug. Who knows... IBM might actually listen.
- Tue May 03, 2016 5:52 am
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Nested IFs or use Contine. What gives better performance?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2447
Re: Nested IFs or use Contine. What gives better performance?
Thanks for your replies. I sent the question to IBMs product team as well. I will update you if I get a reply. I prefer the nested IFs as well as I can then clearly see how a measure is calculated, without having to look in the entire rule-file for variants. I do use continue at the top of a rule fi...
- Fri Apr 29, 2016 7:56 am
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: How to extract the input values from the picklist and transfer to different cube
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2570
Re: How to extract the input values from the picklist and transfer to different cube
This is how I would do it:
The picklist-dimension would have string attributes with Model, Year and Color.
The "different cube" would then contain rules that checks the picklist value and then gets the model, year and color using ATTRS.
The picklist-dimension would have string attributes with Model, Year and Color.
The "different cube" would then contain rules that checks the picklist value and then gets the model, year and color using ATTRS.
- Thu Apr 28, 2016 2:28 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: How to cancel a thread that cannot be cancelled in TM1 Top
- Replies: 25
- Views: 21990
Re: How to cancel a thread that cannot be cancelled in TM1 Top
Thanks for the tip!
- Thu Apr 28, 2016 2:25 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Nested IFs or use Contine. What gives better performance?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2447
Nested IFs or use Contine. What gives better performance?
Hi all, Im rebuilding some stuff at work and need some advice on what is best from a performance perspective. This cube is going to get big because of an "advanced" idea on how things should be organized. Consider the two examples: Example 1: ['Value'] = N: IF( !Period <= ['PeriodBreak1'],...
- Tue Apr 12, 2016 1:14 pm
- Forum: Enhancements
- Topic: RFE 82935 Hidden Dimension tab in TM1 Web 10.2.2
- Replies: 5
- Views: 21140
Re: RFE 82935 Hidden Dimension tab in TM1 Web 10.2.2
FYI, I noticed that Planning Analytics will have the ability to hide a dimension from the end user interface.
- Wed Apr 06, 2016 11:28 am
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: ViewExtractSkipRuleValuesSet
- Replies: 21
- Views: 12050
Re: ViewExtractSkipRuleValuesSet
Personally I wouldn't mind.
I would love it if removal of a rule meant the last calculated value was saved as a static value. But this would then mean that any previous written value would of course have to get overwritten.
I would love it if removal of a rule meant the last calculated value was saved as a static value. But this would then mean that any previous written value would of course have to get overwritten.
- Wed Apr 06, 2016 8:12 am
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Create Contributor application through TI
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2441
Re: Create Contributor application through TI
Try publishing an application from PM or Architect and check the logs for what processes are run. Looking at the control objects there is a process called }tp_application_deploy that seems to do all sorts of things. I would dive into that one. And there are pros here that will probably give you a be...
- Tue Mar 22, 2016 4:26 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Disable logging specific TI process in tm1s-log.properties
- Replies: 33
- Views: 20963
Re: Disable logging specific TI process in tm1s-log.properties
Thanks! I will look into it.
- Thu Mar 17, 2016 5:32 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: TM1 10.3 - IBM Planning Analytics
- Replies: 40
- Views: 37574
Re: TM1 10.3 - IBM Planning Analytics
I was at this thing with IBM a month ago. The new rhetoric was "We have the ambition to create an on-premise version of Planning Analytics".
I laughed a bit...
I laughed a bit...
- Thu Mar 17, 2016 5:25 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Disable logging specific TI process in tm1s-log.properties
- Replies: 33
- Views: 20963
Re: Disable logging specific TI process in tm1s-log.properties
Quick question from a fairly new guy.
If I wanted to learn about configuring logging. What would I google?
I understand that TM1 has this logger. And you can configure this logger to do things. But I cant seem to find what available commands there are.
If I wanted to learn about configuring logging. What would I google?
I understand that TM1 has this logger. And you can configure this logger to do things. But I cant seem to find what available commands there are.
- Thu Mar 17, 2016 5:11 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Does TM1 10.2.2 support Excel 2016 ?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 14758
Re: Does TM1 10.2.2 support Excel 2016 ?
Did anyone get CAFE to work with Excel 2016 32-bit?
I tried to get it working with Excel 2016 64-bit but that didn't go to well. Perspectives seems to work fine. But I would really want the users to start using CAFE instead.
I tried to get it working with Excel 2016 64-bit but that didn't go to well. Perspectives seems to work fine. But I would really want the users to start using CAFE instead.
- Thu Nov 19, 2015 3:50 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Always Expanded Workflow Approval Hierarchy?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1882
Always Expanded Workflow Approval Hierarchy?
Hi, I have users that are annoyed with the fact that they always have to expand the workflow nodes to get to where they are to work. The approval subset is expanded, but this doesn't seem to matter. Is there anyone that has a trick for having this always be fully expanded? We are on TM1 10.2.2 if th...
- Mon Feb 09, 2015 10:36 am
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Shorthand vs Longhand impact on performance?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3663
Re: Shorthand vs Longhand impact on performance?
Normally when talking about "shorthand" vs "longhand" rules is taken to mean ['Element'] vs DB('cube',!dim1,!dim2,...'Element') on the right hand side of the rule. Thanks for your reply. Im new at this so haven't really figured out the lingo yet. Ill call it "midhand" ...
- Sun Feb 08, 2015 10:56 am
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Shorthand vs Longhand impact on performance?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3663
Shorthand vs Longhand impact on performance?
Hi,
Does anyone know if using a longhand instead of shorthand has any effect on performance?
In other words, does writing ['Dimension':'Element'] perform worse than writing ['Element'] in a rule?
Does anyone know if using a longhand instead of shorthand has any effect on performance?
In other words, does writing ['Dimension':'Element'] perform worse than writing ['Element'] in a rule?
- Thu Feb 05, 2015 12:34 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Ownership at Consolidated Level Cannot Commit at 0-Level
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2439
Re: Ownership at Consolidated Level Cannot Commit at 0-Level
Hi,
Did you ever solve this? I'm having similar issues.
Did you ever solve this? I'm having similar issues.
- Tue Oct 28, 2014 7:49 am
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Run process for owned nodes
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1679
Run process for owned nodes
Hello, I have a process that syncs and re-calculates data from one set of measures to a few others. The process is working as intended but Im looking for a way to limit the process to only run for the cost-centers that the user currently has ownership of. Currently Im looking up the user name and ma...