TM1 Forum

Thanks. I created a PMR and got the following answer yesterday: Perspectives/Architect 10.2.2 was tested against PA v2 and is working and is supported. Older than 10.2.2 would not be support. To be able to connect older TM1 Architect/Perspectives (10.2.2) with PA-TM1-Server 2.0.x, you need to follow...

I'm trying to connect a 10.2.2 FP6 client with a PA 2.0.2 server. As far as I know that should be no problem. But when I change the address of the Admin-server in Architect from the 10.2.2 Server to the address of the new PA 2.0.2 server the list of servers in Architect still shows the old entries o...

Hi,

it's a pretty old post but I also run in this problem. I have 10.2.2 with FP7 installed. Even than I don't have this option. Does anyone has something like a workaround?

Thx and best regards,
Willi

Hello, I have an application with an approval hierarchy and a websheet to display and edit the data. So far, so good. But if the user selects to start TM1WEB from only a node and has rights to the consolidation he sees the complete consolidation. If I have the same in a normal cubeview he only get's...

At least for 10.2.2 FP6 the last post in http://www.tm1forum.com/viewtopic.php?f ... 826#p62988 gives the solution. Thx

-Just throwing out a whole lot of ideas here: Thx. I really appriciate. It's likely that I overlooked a point. Do you see any 10.2.2 instances in Server Explorer from 9.5.2 or just -TM1? Just -TM1 Are any of the servers running SSL? Check netstat -a to see if listening on 5495 and 5498 if you are Y...

The connection from 9.5.2-Clients to 9.5.2-Server works. Even the connection from 10.2.2-Clients to 10.2.2-Server. But only 9.5.2-Clients to 10.2.2-Server does not. No entries in log-files.

kaazimraza wrote:Have you updated the client & servers (including pmpsvc folder), restarted admin servers, tm1 servers and the clients?

Yes, I did.

Hi,

I also have an issue with 9.5.2 FP3 clients and 10.2.2 FP3 server. After installing the clients exactly done like IBM mentioned in the documentation I cannot connect to the server with the 9.5.2 clients. Any hints.

Best regards

Thx, I think you mean the same as declanr. I tested this with no effect

Thx for the suggestion. But no change.

Thx for the info

Not quiet the same but similar. We had some major issues with Excel files under 10.2.2 with FP5 and got back to FP3. We didn't tested FP4 (and propbably will test FP6 now).

Hello, first the environment: It's TM1 10.2.2 with FP 3 and FP 6. Both with same behaviour. A very simple model with a Cube with just 2 Dimensions: - Number - Measures In Measures we have some Date-Fields decaled as numeric Elements. In Excel they are formatted as dates. The normal display and enter...

Sorry to come back a Little late. You are taking an approach that a lot of people are advising you against taking. Therefore it is not that surprising that no one has answered the question as to whether it impacts performance because they have never used that approach so they don't know. I am not su...

If they don't wan't to see the navigation tree then surely the logical and sensible solution is to HIDE THE NAVIGATION TREE FORM THE USERS? This is very simple to do in the }ClientSettings cube. Then all you do is build a menu using either action buttons or hyperlinks with URL API so that the users...

We tried it and it worked. It was interpreted as a TM1Web-Sheet. It was not a Hyperlink. The Actionbutton was configured to open a file instead of a TM1-Application.

@tiagoblauth: No, not for this customer @tomok sorry, I may explained it not very well. The user has to click the button. That is not the issue. And the replacement of the current sheet is also no Problem. The issue is that they don't want to see the Applications/Sheets in the Navigation-Tree. And t...

Hello, for the Application in question we use TM1 10.2.2 on a windows-Server with TM1Web as the frontend. The whole app uses a couple of different Excel-Sheets with a Main-Menu from where the other Sheets are called. The user want to replace the current sheet with the called sheet. So a couple of ye...

Thx, that was really the Problem.So for now I put this in a TI and rethink later if I can Change it to a rule in another way.