TM1 Forum

Hi,

I know it's been a while, but have you found a solution for this issue?

Cheers

Hi,

I know it's been a while, but have you found a solution for this issue?

Cheers

Also be aware that modifying the internal dimension order on will modify the order the users will see on the bi side.

See here:

http://www.tm1forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=8613

Hi all, I have 2 cubes on two different TM1 instances on a same server. To me they are identical cubes. The data is the same on both cubes. Same number and order of dimension. However, one of the cubes takes much more memory when loading and much more time to update. Logging is inactive on both inst...

By the way, IBM came back to me claiming that this was the intended design. Disappointing.

Thanks David for your reply. The cube is very heavy on the dimension side, both in number of dimensions and size of them. The worst part of it is that I cannot change the internal order of the dimensions to improve performance. I explain why in that other post: http://www.tm1forum.com/viewtopic.php?...

Hi,

Thanks for your answer.

I understand that TM1 never releases memory, but why isn't it using the memory already allocated to the instance?

That memory is garbage memory and could potentialy be re-used, right?

Thanks

The order has changed surprisingly. An IBM SR will be raised.
Thanks

Hi all, Here is a new issue I am facing in my quest to integrate TM1 and Cognos BI. Environment: Cognos BI 10.1.1 TM1 9.5.2 TM1 cubes are used as data sources in Cognos BI. Description of the issue: To improve performance and memory usage, the dimension order of a cube have been changed via the Cube...

Hi all, Please find bellow the description of an issue I am struggling with at the moment: Environment: Cognos BI 10.1.1 TM1 9.5.2 A Framework Manager DMR package is used as a source (via Package Connector) in Turbo Integrator process. The TI process builds a cube that is then exposed to Cognos BI f...