TM1 Forum

The AddGroup command in TI simply adds a group within the TM1 server. This is not validated against any external security provider the group is just for TM1. Any groups created in this way will not be visible in Cognos Security Administration as they are not CAM groups. Actually, when you provide C...

I think your problem might be related to data reservation http://www.tm1forum.com/viewtopic.php?p=35520#p35493
But it is lucky guess, because of lack of information (TI logs for example)

*EDITED - wrong link

Hi, I had similar issue while loading result data to TM1. I used workaround to deal with it. I created table in SQL with columns from select and function that's populate this table with data. I placed this function in prolog of TI and put simple select * from table in query. In My case it worked. HTH

I don't think that is what he wants to achieve. I want the bahaviour: When I enter the hierarchy in A I want to only see cube AA if I enter in B only see BB and in the case of C I would only see CC In my case, users had functionality, that when they entering different nodes, they had different view...

I don't think that is what he wants to achieve. I want the bahaviour: When I enter the hierarchy in A I want to only see cube AA if I enter in B only see BB and in the case of C I would only see CC In my case, users had functionality, that when they entering different nodes, they had different views...

Jorge, I have just finished "migration" my client from Planning to TM1, and know what you want to achieve. The answer is simple - you can't do it. In Planning you could show different data (cubes, elements, views) in different nodes. In TM1 you apply security to cubes, dimensions and eleme...

Maybe leave decision of processing current intersection to operators. You could add new measure (for example "Process"), and tell users that they have to put 1 in it, when they want to update reporting cube. Then yours TI could work only for intersections with 1 (or <>0), send data to repo...

Thank you,

That's want i wanted to know.

Hi all, I have a theoretical question about best practice to write feeders. Let's assume that i have three cubes with rules: Cube A - filled manual Cube B - some measures taked from A, some filled manual Cube C - all taken from B Now I can write fedders in to ways: 1. A => B, B => C 2. A => B;C, B =...

Thanks you all for replies. I have read more about MDX and manage to do what I want in two MDX based querys.

As i know this is how contributor works. It will show you only nodes from approval hierarchy, and only nodes can be opened in contributor. You can open consolidations in reviewer only, and only in rewiever you have hierarchy. IBM integrated contributor and reviwer in CE 10.1, and in this version you...

Thank you Steve. I suspected that I'm missing something simple... --Edited-- I have checked this, and it's working but it's not enough for me. I want to make few steps, and Prolog and Epilog gives me only two. I tried to create nested processes (executing it from for example Prolog) hoping that data...

I had similiar problem. In my case it was coused when there was two ways to enter value - manual and from calculation. ['NetSales']=N:IF(['Price'] <> 0 & ['QTY']<>0,['Price'] * ['QTY'],STET); When you enter NetSales manual, then Price and Qty, Contibutor tries to save data over rule calculated v...

Hi All, I want to create Drill process to another cube. One of destinations cube elements have MDX subset, that's pointing another subset, to walkaround problem with deleteing subsets when they are useb by view (found on this forum). {[Dim].[Subset_for_recreation]} Now i can delete Subset_for_recrea...

@tomok - mapping was a bad word, passing is what I'm trying to achieve

@qml - next time I wil describe my problem better.

@Steve - Thanks, that's exactly what I was looking for.

I have done TI process and rule, and it is working, but it doesn't map these two dimensions. Lets say I have two cubes: C1 - dimensions: Version, Department C2 - Version, Department_1 When i drill from C1 to C2, Version dimension is mapped correctly, and Department not. It is showing default Deprtme...

Hi all, I'm trying to drill from one cube to another. I have two different named dimensions in this cubes, but with exactly the same elements. I did this because these dimensions are in aproval hierarchy in different Planner aplications. If there is a way to map them in drill process? I tried to map...

FEEDSTRINGS;

I tried this after and before SKIPCHECK;

I let you all know what will IBM say to my service request.

I have done few more tests. I read about ReevaluateConditionalFeeders parameter, and i don't think that's my situation, but checked it and it doesn't work. Changing order of SKIPCHECK and FEEDSTRING also doesn't work. I'm on Cognos Express 9.5 and maybe that's the point. After looking at IBM example...

Isn't this one a simple case of needing to include a FEEDSTRINGS command in the source cube? As I understand FEEDSTRING, this command is used when you want fed element that is a string. I want to fire feeder when string element change and feed simple element. Also I tried put FEEDSTRING in rule in ...