So using the ROUNDP(<32bit float>, 2) is the only way to apply rules that query a cell for the value 0,00 ?
Fabian
Search found 5 matches
- Thu Sep 06, 2012 10:10 am
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: numbers with 13 digits ?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 5139
- Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:49 am
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: numbers with 13 digits ?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 5139
Re: numbers with 13 digits ?
The actual inconsistency is between what I see in the TM1 Viewer and what is exported into the .cma file.
How do you explain that ?
Fabian.
How do you explain that ?
Fabian.
- Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:22 am
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: numbers with 13 digits ?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 5139
Re: numbers with 13 digits ?
It happens anyway .... We see these numbers directly imported from ORACLE. Is it possible that ORACLE stores them like this ? "validation:NUN_LEDGER","IT1:08023120","IT2:FAC1","IT3:XXX","IT4:","IT6:","AC","RAW","128...
- Thu Sep 06, 2012 7:19 am
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: numbers with 13 digits ?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 5139
numbers with 13 digits ?
After loading data from an ORACLE database with the format decimal(13,2) we end up finding numbers in TM1 that look like 90.000000000001 (we exported the data and find these numbers in the .cma file) and therefore also consolidated values that look like 0.0000000000001 We apply rules that check if a...
- Wed Oct 19, 2011 8:06 am
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Show consolidated elements below children
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1670
Show consolidated elements below children
Default behaviour of TM1 is to show consolidations above it's children.
For analysis purposes this is fine, but for standard reporting subtotals and totals are generally shown below their child members.
Is there a way to get this kind of behaviour using subsets ?
Regards,
Fabian
For analysis purposes this is fine, but for standard reporting subtotals and totals are generally shown below their child members.
Is there a way to get this kind of behaviour using subsets ?
Regards,
Fabian
